Reflections on Bennis' On Becoming a Leader

Over the break, I had picked up and was rereading On Becoming a Leader by Warren Bennis for what felt like first time all over again in preparation for an upcoming Leadership Challenge seminar. Specifically, I was looking for the section where Bennis expands on the differences between leaders and managers.

Unique to this review of the book, I immediately felt a little taken aback by some of the words used to describe the two roles as well as the important relationship that exists between the two roles.

Much like the appreciation we felt when we went through identification of the animal characteristics, I began to evaluate the essential components in both roles and how they compliment—not compete– with each other.

I then went on a Google search to find someone who had read and potentially had a like epiphany. As I searched, I hoped I was not unique in my thinking and—guess what--I was not. In fact, several had the same revelation years before me.

One opinion stuck out in my reading. It was an article entitled “Lead:ology - Leaders Versus Managers: A False Dichotomy” by Michael McKinney and published on June 22, 2009 (see http://dayinalifeofstacy.blogspot.com/2010/04/leadology-leaders-versus-managers-false.html).

McKinney says, “The distinctions made by Bennis are important as they expose two very different and equally valuable mindsets. As each works best in the presence of the other, it is to our advantage that we possess and practice both.”

So, my question to you all is this...How do you see Leaders and Managers? Do you agree with the differences as pointed out by Bennis? Is one better than the other? Why or why not? Which role do you associate yourself to?
Would love to hear your thoughts regarding! Shoot me your thoughts via email or use the comments option on this post.

Thanks for letting me share,
~Stacy